🔗 Share this article

The action from the DNC to block the publication of its own post-election analysis on the 2024 election seems shocking but not surprising. Opposed to frank assessments, the party's leadership apparatus operates closer to a PR firm rather than a political organization devoted to cultivating grassroots capacities to secure victories.

A Climate Resistant to Internal Critique

Hesitant to challenge the party establishment's culture demanding unity, the DNC has remained under the Biden-Harris shadow throughout this past year. Making public an official autopsy would have indicated that the leadership truly desire to foster open debate about the missteps which allowed the former president to return to the White House. However, the DNC is proceeding as if there's nothing to be learned following the tragic debacle of 2024.

Our guiding principle: will this lead to victory? If not, it becomes a sideline issue from our fundamental goal," a rationale that has been offered to justify concealing the document.

Major Failures a Report Might Have Examined

Any valuable post-mortem of substance would tackle head-on a series of difficult topics. This encompasses:

• Electoral Disenchantment: Failing to retain of millions of voters who voted for the party's candidate in 2020 was decisive during the tight 2024 election.
• The Decision to Seek Re-election: The stubborn decision of a party leader to seek re-election, coupled with a very late step-aside, has been criticized as robbing Democratic voters of a genuine choice.
• Abandoning Core Democratic Voters: While facing economic anxiety, the campaign is criticized for bowing to corporate donors' interests while failing to challenge the impact of profit-seeking.
• A Foreign Policy Factor: An unwillingness to adjust an approach regarding the situation in Gaza is cited as driving away key demographic groups, notably with young people, Arab American communities, and Muslim Americans.
• Losing Youth Backing: Extensive evidence shows a significant decrease of Democratic support among voters aged 18-29.

A Pattern of Evasion

This refusal aligns with a pattern of sidestepping difficult realities. It echoes a situation where virtually every Democratic officeholder in Washington went along with a sitting president's determination to running for re-election until a disastrous campaign event forced a reversal.

Concurrently, a significant majority within the party's base had been repeatedly informing researchers of their opposition to that candidate to seek re-election.

Financial Issues

An honest autopsy might also examine matters regarding where money went, such as the amounts flowed to insider consultants as well as advertising contractors during an electoral effort that burned through an enormous amount in a short period.

A Underlying Issue

At its core, the blockage of the official autopsy points to an allegiance toward the established hierarchy who engineered a disastrous electoral effort. The implication for the party's base – including countless loyal volunteers – appears to be that they do not have a right to see the lessons the insiders claim to have learned based on a report compiled from conversations with insiders.

An organization unable to critically review its own failings will struggle to escape the pattern that proved so helpful to their opponents.